<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Transition &#187; Web Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/category/web/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-transition.com</link>
	<description>Benjamin Surkyn's personal blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The end of Flash?</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2010/the-end-of-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2010/the-end-of-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blurbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the arrival of the iPad and the lack of Flash support also on this device, I&#8217;m wondering what the future will be for Adobe&#8217;s Flash. Now that HTML 5 is better supported by newer browsers, proprietary technologies like Flash and Silverlight will become obsolete in favor of standards complient ones. Not to forget that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2010/the-end-of-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE Only CSS Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2008/ie-only-css-hack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2008/ie-only-css-hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to use the child element hack. element > child { non-IE properties; } Because Internet Explorer doesn&#8217;t support this. But there is probably going to be an end to this. I came across a hack that is IE-only (which it apparently from 2005, but not known to me). element { property: ; _property: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2008/ie-only-css-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon redesigns</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2007/amazon-redesigns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2007/amazon-redesigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blurbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2007/amazon-redesigns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just before bedtime, I payed a visit to amazon.com and a nice surprise it was&#8230; Amazon is all dressed up for the holidays. Looking great! &#8230; At first sight. I couldn&#8217;t resist looking &#8220;under the hood&#8221;. What a mess!!! Including embedded javascript and CSS. I had expected more from Amazon.com.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2007/amazon-redesigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>html tag and XHTML</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/html-tag-and-xhtml/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/html-tag-and-xhtml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/html-tag-and-xhtml/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When reworking my portfolio site (still working on it) I made the pages XHTML 1.1 compliant and output them as application/xhtml+xml. There is however a problem with these pages are opened in browsers that support the output as XML (others see it as html due to the content negotiation). The html tag that used to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/html-tag-and-xhtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdSense and XHTML</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/google-adsense-and-xhtml/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/google-adsense-and-xhtml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/google-adsense-and-xhtml/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When working on a new site, I wanted to go web standards all the way. Since I want to use XHTML strict as markup language, that meant serving pages as application/xhtml+xml. Now since IE doesn&#8217;t support this, I had to use content negotiation. So far so good. My pages are supplied as XML in compliant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2006/google-adsense-and-xhtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft.com update</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/microsoftcom-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/microsoftcom-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching for the XP SP2 page, I was pleasantly supprised by the Microsoft.com site update. The layout looks nice, the code, relative to the old one, looks even better. There is a great article at Stopdesign about the Microsoft advances, you shoud check it out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/microsoftcom-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using lists for menus</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/using-lists-for-menus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/using-lists-for-menus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accesibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing, almost every site has, is a menu. How else do you expect your visitors to reach all the content on you site? But how do you create a nice, content-from-layout-separated menu? You use lists, preforably unnumbered lists. Let me show you how...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/using-lists-for-menus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web standards are good for you</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/webstandards-are-good-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/webstandards-are-good-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you surf arround a lot, you&#8217;ve definitely come accros a web standards topic. It is a buzzword at the moment so it is ofter used. In a lot of articles about them you&#8217;ll find how to do things and how not to, but why should you use them on your site? First of all, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/webstandards-are-good-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSS Content</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/css-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/css-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The whole deal with Web Standards, tableless design and keeping design and content separate is in my opinion a good thing. Personally, my code is a lot cleaner (it is not 100%, but then again, whose code is?), pages are smaller,&#8230; So I like it. One thing has me wondering, though. In CSS 2 there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/css-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Validators</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/validators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/validators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Surkyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-transition.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to keep your site standard valid, you&#8217;re going to need to validate it. Here are some validators to do so: http://www.alexkeeny.com/validator/ (Personally one of my favorites) http://generator.beseku.com/ W3C validator Renewed about 3 weeks ago Now, if you want to check your CSS, this might help.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-transition.com/archives/2004/validators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

